Go to content Go to the menu Go to the search

Groups, Representations and Analysis in Number Theory - Harald Andres Helfgott

Quick access, personalized services


Advanced search


Direction de la communication


Marie Pinhas-Diena, in charge of scientific communications l tel: +33 (0)1 44 27 22 89 l email: marie.pinhas@upmc.fr

GRANT: Groups, Representations and Analysis in Number Theory, Harald Andres Helfgott

The last decade has seen remarkable progress in the study of growth in infinite families of groups. The main approach has its roots in additive combinatorics, but it has truly given fruit in a non-commutative context. The central role is played not by groups in isolation, but by actions of groups. It is from this perspective that my plan addresses, at the same time, questions on growth in groups as such and hard problems in analytic number theory.


While this line of research on growth started with the study of matrix groups, it has now given strong results on permutation groups as well. Two outstanding matters are the control of the dependence on rank in matrix groups, and the removal of the need for the Classification Theorem in permutation groups. Going beyond these questions on diameter and expansion, there are at least three new directions I propose to explore: towards algorithms, towards geometric group theory, and towards number theory.


Some of the main recent results in the area take the form of diameter bounds. Bounding a diameter amounts to showing that one can express any element of a group as a short product of generators. One of the main algorithmic questions consists in actually finding such an expression, and doing so rapidly. Links between geometric group theory (which studies growth in infinite groups) and the new combinatorial techniques ought to become stronger. Sofic and hyperlinear groups – which arose in part from geometric group theory – seem to invite a combinatorial approach.


Additive combinatorics has already shown its relevance to exponential sums, which play a central role in analytic number theory. Can a newer perspective based on actions of groups give more general results? Short Kloosterman sums, which are particularly hard to bound, are a particular test case.


I also plan to pursue related interests in automorphic forms - which are a classical example of the relevance of group actions to number theory - and model theory.


Institut de mathématiques de Jussieu (IMJ, CNRS/UPMC/Université Paris Diderot/FSMP)Nouvelle fenêtre